Showing posts with label Philip Seymour Hoffman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip Seymour Hoffman. Show all posts

Apr 4, 2012

Magnolia [1999]


Magnolia, the 1999 drama written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson is a special kind of movie; it's fast, intricate, with many characters and storylines. It's complicated, but if you think about it, it's also fucking brilliant.

Apparently Anderson wrote the script in a 2 weeks vacation spent the William H.Macy's Vermont cabin, and was inspired by Aimee Mann's music. Described as an epic mosaic, the script unleashes a huge amount of consequences and interrelated storylines that I am not even going try to explain.

PTA said the idea developed from Claudia, one of my favorite characters from this movie; her and Jim's storyline was so good, sweet and romantic, but still real and sad. At the beginning you have the urge to characterize her simply as a drugged-out-of-her mind woman, but as time passes and she starts interacting with more people, people who you see in other situations in other parts of the movie, you understand her. Jim was a very good addition and I thought his naive behavior was endearing and surprisingly fitting with Claudia.



One of the film's main attributes are, of course, the characters. Claudia is just the starting point, but I was also impressed by Tom Cruise, who was surprisingly good as a superstar lecturer on how to conquer women- seeing him on that stage, shouting "Tame the cunt" reminded me so much of Eli Sunday, from There will be blood, maybe just because I saw the movie recently, but also because I could easily see the fanaticism, the craziness and devotion both offer to their jobs and beliefs- it was a full throttle performance. Mister Cruise was crazy good and that crying scene just proved me that he is indeed, a great actor, no matter his attitude, appearance or choice of roles. Other standouts include William H.Macy, as the former genius kid who won the TV contest, but now struggles with loneliness, and Jason Robards, as Earl Partridge.


I fell in love with Stanley and his genius storyline (the peeing scene was something else and Luis Guzman is always fun to watch), plus Phillip Seymour Hoffman's presence improved it in many ways, but I honestly didn't see any point on Julianne's character being there- it was pretty useless and the movie would still have been perfectly fine without her. [p.s. She looks so much like my sister, it creeps me out every time I see her on screen- my mind goes directly to R, my older sibling]

From a filmmaking point of view, it was interesting to watch: it had very fast, dynamic shots, and it did remind me of Boogie Nights in some aspects. The music score was very good and I liked the fact that it almost always gave me the impression something big was about to happen- it certainly maintained my attention throughout the movie. Considering Anderson's interest in Aimee Mann, of course the film featured a couple of her songs, one of which is sung by all the characters- something that I found to be particularly weird and a little out of place; what is this? an REM video?

Anyway, that wasn't the most shocking part of the movie; actually nothing was until that moment where [SPOILER ALERT] the frogs started pouring down from the sky- it was a WTF moment and I didn't understand it at the beginning- I honestly had to read IMDb trivia to get it. Apparently PTA was obsessed with a quote from the Bible, Exodus 8:2, which is heavily featured in the movie, in one way or another- it reads: "And if thou refuse to let them go, behold, I will smite all thy borders with frogs."

If the first 2/3 of the movie involved a lot of action and intertwined situations, the last part was mostly based on speeches and tying up loose ends. I mostly liked the way PTA provided closure for the people, and the Frankie Mackie- Earl Partridge scene was particularly emotional.

"Magnolia" is not an easy movie to decipher or talk about- it has so many characters, storylines and themes, it touches upon subjects like regret, lost, loneliness, love- it tries too hard in so many directions, and as expected, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But in the end this film is special- I, personally, love movies that stand out, that surprise or shock me, and this succeeded in doing so.

"Magnolia" is a very interesting movie, different from your average drama, that you can't judge or give a final mark after the credits roll- you need to think about it, to process it. If you saw it, let me know what you think about it in the comments; if you didn't, what are you waiting for?

Nov 28, 2011

Just in case you haven't, you should...

..check out this movies!

Both are freshly taken from the movie jar, as I have seen them a long time ago, but I just wanted to remind you of some great films!  I am curious to see which one you like!

Boogie Nights

5 minutes in and I already recognize 98% of the cast: Julianne Moore, Heather Graham, John C.Reilly, William Macy.,Don Cheadle and, of course Mark Whalberg. The sweet, chilled out, respectful, dorky haircut Mark Whalberg...and then he takes his clothes off and I’m already in love with this movie (hey, don’t judge, i’m a girl, he’s hot, what can I do?).

He shows off his acting chops right from the beginning, starting with the loud and brutal discussion he has with his mother, and then decides to change his life. Oh, and what a life he is going to have...for about 5 years....and then things go down.

I have got to mention some random characters that I just loved and giggled over. Don Cheadle as a very loveale, confused guy, always changing his style. Phillip Seymour Hoffman as an unrecognizable very sweet, cool and gentle gay guy. Julianne Moore as the motherly type to all the misfits in the house.

Seeing this movie you get everything: cool music, attrative guys and girls, sex scenes, OMG moments (the first movie Dirk shot, the 80s new years eve party), action. I enjoyed this movie and I think you will, too!

And in the end, they finally showed us what the big deal was all about! J


American Beauty
Listen up, all you folks who like to make To-See movie lists.

Add American Beauty to your list right now, if you haven't seen it! Reasons? Well, let’s see:  great performances from Kevin Spacey, Wes Bentley or Tory Burch, the story is simple, yet very intriguing in some parts, you will get some OMG moments, the direction is amazing and stands out in so many ways (the way it was shot, the angles- it's Sam Mendes in all its glory) and it did win some awards in his days! Try it!


I am sure most of you have seen these films, so which one do you like most? Why?




Nov 11, 2011

Capote vs Infamous




Capote and Infamous, two wonderful films about Truman Capote and his process of writing In Cold Blood, were released very close one to another, in 2005 and 2006. The first was based on the book of Gerald Clarke, the second on George Plimpton's novel. Capote had Philip Seymour Hoffman(PSH) playing Truman Capote, while Infamous casted Toby Jones(TJ). Harper Lee, an important character and friend to the author was portrayed by both Catherine Keener and Sandra Bullock. Although the story and the main ideas of the film are almost identical, the movies are different in many ways.

First of all, Infamous is visibly more colourful, with a larger array of characters, more celebrities, full of life, extravagant, noisy, vibrant in many ways. The film is lighter and shows the relationship between the novelist and the prisoner in a much violent, daring, in-your-face way. Capote is quiet, somber, with mixed emotions of fear, melancholia, sadness, betrayal, love and others; the relationship is displayed in a discrete way and you can sense there is more to them then meets the eye.

Second of all, in the 2006 adaptation, you learn more about the killers and their background from the actual individuals, you see, hear, clearly understand their motivation and drive. They seem simple, you can either love them or hate them, there is nothing to hide. In the 2005 one, you get to know the two men, especially Perry Smith through the eyes of Truman Capote. He is the backbone, he is the voice of reason, he tells you what happened; you feel what he feels.

Third of all, the performances are rather opposite. While Toby Jones is exuberant, excentric, full of life, sometimes caricaturistic, PSH portrays Truman Capote in a much more natural, interesting, complex way; his performance has layers, in-depth aspects to it that gives the movie more drama, more passion, intrigue and emotion. He does deserve the Oscar for this role. As Harper Lee, the two ladies have a different approach to it, as well. Catherine Keener seems borned in this role, it is natural, but with Sandra Bullock you can feel the artistry there, you can see the acting, but it'a beautiful thing to watch- I think she gave a wonderful performance.

Infamous is above, bubblying on the surface, whilst Capote is much more subtile and complex. Overall, I'd probably choose Capote, although Infamous has many strong points as well.

Did you watch them?Which one would you choose?